1271 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020-1401
Tel: +1.212.906.1200 Fax: +1.212.751.4864
www.lw.com
|
||
FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES
|
||
Beijing
|
Moscow
|
|
Boston
|
Munich
|
|
Brussels
|
New York
|
|
Century City
|
Orange County
|
|
Chicago
|
Paris
|
|
May 20, 2021
|
Dubai
|
Riyadh
|
Düsseldorf
|
San Diego
|
|
Frankfurt
|
San Francisco
|
|
Hamburg
|
Seoul
|
|
Hong Kong
|
Shanghai
|
|
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Technology
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549-6010
|
Houston
|
Silicon Valley
|
London
|
Singapore
|
|
Los Angeles
|
Tokyo
|
|
Madrid
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
Milan
|
Attention:
|
Jeff Kauten
|
|
Larry Spirgel
|
||
Lisa Etheredge
|
||
Robert Littlepage
|
||
Re:
|
Taboola.com Ltd.
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form F-4
|
||
Filed May 20, 2021
|
||
CIK No. 0001840502
|
1. |
Wherever GAAP measures are disclosed along with non-GAAP measures, please clearly
differentiate between the two and present the most directly comparable financial measure so that the non-GAAP measure is not given greater prominence. We note one or both of these issues in several places throughout your filing including,
but not limited to, pages 7, 71, 120, 139, 142, 145, 148-149 and 159. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K.
|
2. |
We note your disclosure of preliminary financial results for the period ended March 31, 2021. Your presentation of preliminary results should
include sufficient narrative disclosure to provide appropriate context. In this regard, you should provide your analysis of the preliminary results so that investors can understand what they mean. For example, indicate whether the preliminary
results are consistent with the trend disclosure in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
3. |
In the portion of your table that reconciles GAAP revenue to GAAP gross profit, please
revise to remove the phrase “adjusted to exclude the following.” The inclusion of the phrase could cause GAAP gross profit to be confused with a non-GAAP measure. Please make similar revisions on page 159 and elsewhere as appropriate.
|
5. |
We note your response to prior comment 5. Please revise to disclose the most directly
comparable GAAP measure to Ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to ex-TAC Gross Profit, which appears to be Net Income (Loss) to GAAP Gross Profit. The most directly comparable GAAP measure should be disclosed with greater prominence wherever ex-TAC
Gross Profit is disclosed or discussed.
|
6. |
We note your response to prior comment 2. Please revise exhibit 3.2 to clarify that the exclusive forum provision does not apply to Exchange Act
claims or advise.
|
Very truly yours,
|
|
Senet S. Bischoff
|
|
of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
|